Giulio Ubertis «Circumstantial proof»: oxymoron or redundancy to avoid pp. 299-316, DOI: 10.1415/84912 Details Buy Cite
Benito V. Frosini The statistical evaluation of evidence pp. 317-334, DOI: 10.1415/84913 Details Buy Cite
Michele Taruffo Scientific Evidence. General features pp. 335-354, DOI: 10.1415/84914 Details Buy Cite
Alessandro Corda Neuroscientific evidence: on the possibilities and limits of its use in the field of criminal justice pp. 355-380, DOI: 10.1415/84915 Details Buy Cite
Francesca Poggi If I were in your shoes. The proof of intention in Italian Criminal Law pp. 381-400, DOI: 10.1415/84916 Details Buy Cite
Fabio BuzziLivia Maria Paliero The evidence of biological damage pp. 401-418, DOI: 10.1415/84917 Details Buy Cite
Marco Q. Silvi The Use of Paper and Digital Documents pp. 449-470, DOI: 10.1415/84920 Details Buy Cite
Alessandra Facchi Una discussione da differenti prospettive pp. 471-474, DOI: 10.1415/84921 Details Buy Cite
Maurizio Ferrera Empirical Political Theory and Social Rights pp. 475-494, DOI: 10.1415/84922 Details Buy Cite
Giorgio Pino Social Rights. Towards a Critique of Some Common Places pp. 495-518, DOI: 10.1415/84923 Details Buy Cite
Francesco Battegazzorre Power and Rights: in Search of an Agreement on Fundamentals pp. 519-530, DOI: 10.1415/84924 Details Buy Cite
Olivia Bonardi Labour law and social rights: an evolving dialectical relationship pp. 531-540, DOI: 10.1415/84925 Details Buy Cite
Thomas Casadei Social rights and «process of de-constitutionalisation» pp. 541-552, DOI: 10.1415/84926 Details Buy Cite
Francesca Pasquali Which rights are genuine rights? A comparison between social and civil rights pp. 553-564, DOI: 10.1415/84927 Details Buy Cite
Nicola Riva Social Rights and the Atomistic Conception of Fundamental Rights pp. 565-576, DOI: 10.1415/84928 Details Buy Cite
Enrico Diciotti Immigration and the State: An Ethical Issue pp. 577-601, DOI: 10.1415/84929 Details Buy Cite
Publisher’s Ethics Il Mulino adopts and promotes specific guidelines about publishing ethics. Our ethics statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Most downloaded articles (last 2 months) , I valutatori 2019. Giovanni Battista Ratti, Sistemi normativi e proposizioni normative indecidibili. Gianmarco Gometz, Digital Populism and Hetero-Directed Democracy: In Medio Stat Periculum. Domenico Melidoro, Principles of Secularism. Is the Clash among Principles Necessary?. Gloria Origgi, Can Democracy survive Facebook? Epistemic Egualitarism, Cognitive Vulnerability, ICTs. Andrea Monti, A contribution to the analysis of the legal status of cryptocurrencies. Chiara Angiolini, Valentina Calderai, Stefania Cavagnoli, Francesca Coppola, Daniela Danna, Mariachiara Feresin, Olivia Guaraldo, Cristina Luzzi, Silvia Niccolai, Elisa Olivito, Susanna Pozzolo, Patrizia Romito, Lola Santos Fernández, Laura Sugamele, Mater iuris: la differenza sessuale come principio di libertà. Presentazione. Laura Sugamele, The economic value of procreation at the time of the neoliberal biomarket. Gianmarco Gometz, Monica Tawa Folarin, Supervised electronic voting and blockchain. Marco Pelissero, The preventive criminal law in the age of insecurity. [continue...]
Details
Buy
Cite