Table of contents of the issue 2-3/2014, spring-summer
Il lavoro e la giustizia. Interpretare. argomentare. decidere
I. L'interpretazione del diritto del lavoro
Thories of Interpretation. An overview
Current Thinking of Labour Lawyers on the Interpretation
Interpretation in Labour Law. Instructions for Use
Interpretive Rules in Case-Law Jurisprudence
The Judicial Action as a Form of Collective Protection
II. Autotutela, giurisdizione, deflazione del contenzioso
Negotiation and Jurisdiction
Extrajudicial Composition of Litigations: The Procedure Set Down by Article 7, Act No. 604/1966
Certification of Employment Contract and Judicial Protection
III. Ruolo e discrezionalità del giudice
Justificatory Opinions of Judgments: "In Pejus" Reforms
Something Between Confusion and Distrust. General Clauses and Labour Court's Discretion
Multi-Level Protection, Ambiguous Rules and the Role of Judges and of the Legislator. The case of Fixed-Term Work
After the Reform of art. 18 of the Italian Statute of Workers: Judge's Decisions between Allegations and Rules of Evidence. Open Questions
IV. Fonti del diritto e tecniche argomentative
(Almost) Federal Courts and Recent Labour Law
Effectiveness of the Law as an Objective and as an Argument. The Case Law of the European Court of Justice Between Interventionism and Self-Restraint
The Constitution as a Legal Argument. Labour Judges and "Constitutional Oriented Interpretation"
V. Giustizia del lavoro e processo
Publisher's Ethics
The journals on this platform adopt and promote specific guidelines (PEMS) about publishing ethics. Our ethics statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Keep reading