Abstract

Unlike what occurs in other experiences of thought intended to respond in final terms to questions that ask who is the subject, Maurice Blanchot's reflections seem to invite one to look at the question of subjectivity suspending any determination through a constant denegation movement. Only conceiving a subject without subject, that is, a subject who maintains his silence on his very being while he breaks it, it would be possible to escape from any metaphysical subjectification and likewise any grammatical anthropomorphism, thereby arriving at a subject who maintains his very fullness right inside nothing.