Vulnerability in the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
The concept of vulnerability appears to be relevant in many judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Firstly, I distinguish three possible meanings of the words «vulnerable» and «vulnerability»; secondly, I examine both the meaning of those words in the Court's discourse and the Court's reasonings where it is relevant the fact that a person or group is (in the opinion of the Court) vulnerable. Such an examination leads to the following conclusions: in the Court's discourse, those words have a broad and indeterminate meaning; the fact that a person or group is vulnerable plays a role in different types of reasonings and in the application of several rules of the European Convention on Human Rights; the degree of relevance of that fact is generally unclear in those reasonings.
- European Court of Human Rights
- Indeterminate Concepts
- Legal Reasoning
- Legal Interpretation