Enrico Diciotti Vulnerability in the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights pp. 13-34, DOI: 10.7382/92079 Details Cite
Roberto Chenal The Definition of the Notion of Vulnerability and the Protection of Fundamental Rights pp. 35-56, DOI: 10.7382/92080 Details Cite
Lucia Corso Vulnerability, Constitutional Judgement and Sentimentalism pp. 57-76, DOI: 10.7382/92081 Details Cite
Maria Giulia Bernardini Vulnerability and Disability in Strasbourg: The «Vulnerable Groups Approach» in Practice pp. 77-94, DOI: 10.7382/92082 Details Cite
Cosimo Nicolini Coen Conditions of Possibility and the Value of Discretion in the Judicial Field pp. 95-112, DOI: 10.7382/92083 Details Cite
Francesca Scamardella A. Grompi, V come vulnerabilità, Cittadella, Assisi, 2017 pp. 113-118, DOI: 10.7382/92084 Details Cite
Publisher’s Ethics Il Mulino adopts and promotes specific guidelines about publishing ethics. Our ethics statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Most downloaded articles (last 2 months) Enrico Diciotti, Vulnerability in the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Maria Giulia Bernardini, Vulnerability and Disability in Strasbourg: The «Vulnerable Groups Approach» in Practice. Roberto Chenal, The Definition of the Notion of Vulnerability and the Protection of Fundamental Rights. Lucia Corso, Vulnerability, Constitutional Judgement and Sentimentalism. Baldassare Pastore, Introduzione. Michele Taruffo, Hermeneutics, Evidence, and Decision. Ulfrid Neumann, Teoria dell'argomentazione giuridica. Francesca Scamardella, A. Grompi, V come vulnerabilità, Cittadella, Assisi, 2017. Cosimo Nicolini Coen, Conditions of Possibility and the Value of Discretion in the Judicial Field. Enzamaria Tramontana, Soft Law and the Resilience of International Law. [continue...]
Details
Cite