Giulio Guarini

The Aghion-Howitt Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Process with Nonneoclassical Technological Hypotheses

  • Abstract

Informations and abstract


The aim of this paper is to analyse the neo-Schumpeterian approach of Aghion-Howitt with reference to the 1992 (basic model), 1997 and 1998 versions, setting some further hypotheses necessary for the steady state of positive growth not included in the original contributions. I demonstrated that with a number of different, plausible non-neoclassical hypotheses on technology we can dispense with the process of creative destruction and the steady-state growth rate. We modified the technological hypotheses including in the Aghion-Howitt type model with heterogeneous goods, used as means of production of other goods, the concave trend of the techniques envelope (1992; 1997; 1998) in a significant part, and considered increasing returns in the Cobb-Douglas functions proposed by the authors (1992; 1998), so as to have a positive relation between wage and labour (for the 1992 and 1998 versions) and between rate of interest and capital (for the 1998 version). As a result we found that with these non-neoclassical hypotheses on the technology, which appear in principle hard to rule out, process of creative destruction and positive steady-state growth rate do not exist. The intention here is in fact to demonstrate that the widely acclaimed endogenous growth models like the Aghion-Howitt model are liable to the above criticisms, given that the results turn out very differently with the introduction of non-neoclassical hypotheses. Such hypotheses must therefore be taken into due consideration when studying these models in terms of their implications for theory and policy.

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat

Article first page

Article first page