The Judgment on "G.I.E.M" Case and the Debate Between the European Court of Human Rights and National Courts
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
This paper aims to analyse the judgment "G.I.E.M v. Italy" of the Grand Chamber of European Court of Human Rights. In particular, it addresses two different aspects: the compatibility of the controversial Italian measure of «confiscation without a formal conviction» with Art. 7 ECHR and the relationship between the European Court and the Italian Constitutional Court.
Keywords
- Confiscation
- Penalty
- Conviction
- Well-established Case Law
- Dialogue Between Courts
