Un pluralismo logico robusto
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
The seminal book on logical pluralism written by Beall and Restall (2006) is discussed. The most relevant scholarly literature on the topic is critically presented. A more syntactical form of logical pluralism is defended. In particular, it is shown that the question of logical pluralism without a bit of Platonist commitment is not philosophically relevant
Keywords
- Logical Pluralism
- Platonism in Logic
- Logical Consequence
- Monotonicity
- Transitivity
- Reflexivity
