Adoración Castro Jover

Freedom of Conscience, Conscientious Objection and Right to the Conscientious Objection

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

The person who objects faces always a mandatory or prohibitive legal norm, issued to protect common good, or other people's rights, which avoids or obliges him or her to act against his/her conscience. Legal and judicial analisis proves but with few exceptions how suitable legal norms are to guarantee both the right to conscientious objection -a direct and individual right- and the rights of other people. As far as the legal norm contains undefined legal concepts, the case must/should be resolved by a civil servant institutions and or a judge. On the contrary, the conflict between two individual rights should be sentenced by a judge.

Keywords

  • Freedom of Conscience
  • Conscientious Objection
  • Rigtht to Conscientious Objection

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat