Nicolò Zanon

A Reflection on Value Pluralism and the Unity of the Law

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

The essay reviews critically that stream of literature, dominant in a wide part of the current «neo-constitutionalist» culture, which identifies principles and values. It tries to demonstrate how the overlapping of values and principles prevents us to grasp a key distinction in the history of modern constitutionalism. This distinction is the one between the external regulatory function of the law - its so called objective function, which puts order and pacifies conflicts - and the freedom of the inner forum of the interpreter of the law - realm of freedom of conscience which is relentlessly looking for which value to adhere. Within this distinction, specific attention is devoted to the role of the judge as a qualified interpreter with real decision-making powers. The paper advocates a renewed judicial modesty, especially in those controversial cases dealing with divisive issues which are widely debated within public opinion and in the political fora.

Keywords

  • Values
  • Principles
  • Neo-constitutionalism
  • Judicial Modesty
  • Deference

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat