A Reply to Ratti and Brigaglia and Celano's Comments on Deontics: Meaning, Reasoning, and Emotion
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
This article replies to the criticisms of Ratti, and of Brigaglia and Celano, of the model theory of deontics. It argues that the theory is consistent and that logic is an implausible basis for human reasoning.
Keywords
- Model Theory
- Deontics
- Reasoning
