Giulia Terzian María Inés Corbalán

False can be good: Language acquisition and idealization

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

Since its inception, generative linguistics has been shaped by a major explanatory challenge, known as the problem of language acquisition: how do children acquire their native language, given the poverty of data available to them and the narrow time frame within which they accomplish this feat? For a long time, the so-called Principles and Parameters framework was thought to provide a satisfactory and even definitive solution to this problem. But despite its unprecedented explanatory success, P&P has since been abandoned, on the grounds that it is incompatible with evolutionary theory. We argue that this is a problematic reasoning move, insofar as it is predicated on an unconvincing assumption concerning the epistemic status of P&P. We thus offer an alternative and more plausible interpretation of this account, as a simplified and idealized model of language acquisition. Finally, we discuss certain benefits of our proposal, both where P&P is concerned and more generally for linguistic theory.

Keywords

  • Plato’
  • s problem
  • methodological naturalism
  • idealization
  • scientific models

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat